Prevalence and Predisposing Factors of Parkinson Disease: A Community-Based Study In Barangay Mangilag Sur, Candelaria, Quezon: A Research Protocol
Danica Jane S.J. Robles, Ron Christian Neil T. Rodriguez, Nadia Beatrice S.Romana, Joseph Mariuz B. Rosales, Mary Camille E. Rosales, Gerardo B. Salazar, Raymond L. Rosales
Sep 2017 DOI 10.35460/2546-1621.2017-0057
INTRODUCTION
I. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Parkinson Disease (often abbreviated to PD and may also be called as idiopathic or primary parkinsonism) is a neurodegenerative disorder, affecting the central nervous system (CNS). (1) It is caused by the death of dopamine-generating cells in the midbrain, specifically the ventral region of the pars compacta of the substantianigra. (2) The lack of dopamine in this region causes movement-related disorders (3), which are the primary signs for diagnosing PD. Although there are new neurodiagnostic tests, the diagnosis of PD is mainly done by clinical consultation with neurologists, who are considered to be the gold standard in diagnosing the disorder. (4)
According to Jankovic (5), there are four (4) cardinal movement disorders associated with PD. These are tremors or shaking, rigidity, hypokinesia or slowness of movement, and postural instability. In addition, non-motor manifestations of PD, which occur in all stages of the disorder, carries an impact on the quality of life of a person. For instance, the occurrence of a state of anxiety, depression, and fatigue in Filipinos diagnosed with PD have been well documented in local PD cohort studies.
The causes of PD can be due to certain environmental factors, and, to a certain degree, due to heredity and genetics of a person. Environmental factors that may cause the disease include, but are not limited to, exposure to pesticides and insecticides, injuries to the head, and the livelihood, lifestyle, and location of the patient, with those living in the rural areas being noted to have a higher exposure to such environmental factors. (8) In genetics, PD is often considered as a non-hereditary disease. Although, in rare cases, it may present itself as a genetic disease. A study by Hatano, et al., (13) also pointed a mutation in the PINK1 gene in Filipinos that causes autosomal recessive PD.
In the Philippines, PD is a rarely seen disorder, due to some of the symptoms being similar to certain health disorders. Furthermore, due to the geography of the Philippine islands, it is difficult for neurologists to ascertain reported cases of PD as some areas are inaccessible. A 2007 study conducted by the Philippine Neurological Association (PNA) (29) has reported that the nationwide prevalence of PD in the country is less than one percent (< 1%), though this is the observed data without ascertainment of reported cases. (15,16) At present, however, there are studies that have established the existence of an indigenous x-linked hereditary disorder which shows similar features to parkinsonism in the island of Panay. This is noted by the studies of Rosales (17), Fernandez and Rosales (18), and Lee, et al (19), as the X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) or “lubag” in the native/vernacular language. As of date, there is no existing community-based study regarding the prevalence of PD in the Philippines as well as case ascertainment of the reported cases. Case ascertainment is a crucial requirement for differentiating PD from XDP.
Thus, this study aims to conduct a community-based study on PD in order to determine the prevalence of PD in a selected rural and urban area accompanied by case ascertainment of the people in the community who have shown symptoms of PD. Furthermore, it is the long-term objective of the researchers of this study that the study will help in the creation of a protocol to diagnose if a person has PD.
II. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
As of today, there are no available community-based prevalence studies in the Philippines concerning PD. Only a nationwide survey has been done to observe the prevalence of the disorder in the country, but there is no case ascertainment made in certain study areas of the research to account for the actual statistics. This study will perform the community-based study, accompanied with case ascertainment, to improve the existing statistics of the prevalence of PD in the country. The data collected on the prevalence of PD will also open the pathway for the pharmaceutical industry to rationalize their entry in the Philippines and introduce established and new medications for PD. The derived data can also provide the platform for future participation in clinical trials. (20) The study, being a community-based survey, will also increase the potential of case-control studies in the future for homogenous populations.
Furthermore, as the study site for this research are specific communities in contrast to a nationwide point-of-view, the selected study sites may provide the necessary data on the predisposing risk factors and these factors’ relation to the probability of a person developing PD after a period of time of his/her life. This study could provide a comparison of different predisposing risk factors which could include family-related, occupational or environmental contributory factors.
III. RESEARCH QUESTIONS
- What is the prevalence of PD in Barangay Mangilag Sur of Candelaria, Quezon?
- What are the possible predisposing risk factors and these factors’ relation to the probability of a person developing early onset PD?
IV. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The general objective of the study is to determine the prevalence and the predisposing factors of PD in a Philippine-based community. Specifically, to conduct a community-based survey to screen possible cases of PD in order to provide case ascertained prevalence in the Philippines and to provide the necessary data on the predisposing risk factors and their association with the development of early onset PD.
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
I. Parkinson Disease
PD, named after its discoverer Dr. James Parkinson, is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting the midbrain region of the brainstem. It is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease affecting 1% of the world population after the age of 65 years. (21) The etiology of the disease remains unclear in most cases but current theories suggest a combination of age, genetic susceptibility and environmental factors. (11-22-24) The typical age of onset for the disorder is between fifty to seventy (50-70) years old, though it may also develop in people who are less than forty (40) years old, the latter case being termed as Young Onset Parkinson Disease (YOPD). (29)
PD is often diagnosed after a clinical consultation with a neurologist, who is considered to be the gold standard in diagnosing the disorder, although, this would only lead to the diagnosis of a probable or possible PD. (4) To obtain a definitive diagnosis, Gelb (4) noted that neuropathologic examination must also be done. Histopathologic slides of the substantia nigra would show the loss of neurons and the presence of Lewy bodies in the remaining nerve cells, confirming that a patient has PD. (31) As PD also results from the loss of dopamine in the midbrain, a significant improvement of the symptoms after the intake of medications such as levodopa (which can improve dopamine production) can confirm an accurate diagnosis of PD.
II. Parkinson Disease and the World
In some community-based studies done abroad, in order for the researchers to identify the target population, they either set an inclusion criteria (32) or recruit participants who are newly diagnosed with PD through case ascertainment. (33) Patients are also identified through records available at specific (health) departments like the Department of Neurology in Akershus University Hospital which is the only neurological department in Norway. (32) PD is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder which is not only characterized by one’s problem in movements but as well as non-motor symptoms. (34) A community-based study done by Svensson, Beiske, Loge, Beiske, and Sivertsen (32) focused on one of the non-motor symptoms.
Problems concerning disturbances in patients’ sleep are typical in patients with PD. Studies involving this are well-documented. Another important clinical consequence for patients with PD as well as to their caregivers is the risk for dementia. A community-based cohort prospective study was undertaken in Rogaland, Norway involving 171 non-demented patients. The results of the study indicated that patients with PD have an al-most sixfold increased risk to becoming demented compare to those without (37). Another risk for patients with PD is the occurrence of depression. In the community-based study conducted by Tandberg et al., (39) involving 245 patients with PD and two control groups of 100 (with diabetes) and 100 (healthy elderly individuals), 7.7% of the 245 patients with PD met the criteria for major depression, 5.1% were moderately to severely depressed and 45.5% had mild depressive symptoms based on the Montgomery and Ashberg De-pression Rating. In addition, 24.1% of the patients with PD have a Beck Depression In-ventory score of 18 or more which was higher compared to the two control groups. However, the results suggested that the prevalence of major depression in PD is actually lower compared to previously assume.
III. Parkinson Disease and the Philippines
The clinical diagnosis of PD is made by the presence of the classical triad composed of bradykinesia or slowing, rest tremor and rigidity, which stand to be the core features of the disease. Rest tremor, or the presence of tremor when the affected limb is at rest yet absent during voluntary activity, is characteristic of PD. It may be a source of confusion during diagnosis owing to its absence in 30% of PD patients. Bradykinesia or slowing, on the other hand, may be tested by rapid, alternating movements to be done by the patient who may initially perform well, yet decline in speed and amplitude upon further repetition. Rigidity or increased muscle tone may be tested in the arm by gentle extension/flexion of the wrist and elbow, and supination/pronation of the forearm. It is also important to note that PD is asymmetric at onset, observable by the commencement of bradykinesia or tremor on one side. The contralateral side is affected with the progression of the disease eventually.
As for the treatment of PD, the PNA (29) states that “making a diagnosis of Parkinson disease is not a reason to start treatment.” Rather, the onset of functional impairment is usually the marker for most specialists to begin pharmacological treatment. Absence of functional impairment would favor nonpharmacologic approaches such as “education, support services, management of emotional needs of the patient and caregiver, exercise, nutrition and physical therapy.” The presence of functional impairment, on the other hand, varies from individual to individual and factors such as the involvement of the patient’s dominant hand, his employment and employability, imbalance (possibly increasing the risk to falls and serious injury), as well as the impact of the symptoms on the patient’s daily living must be taken into consideration. Pharmacologic therapy involve the use of dopaminergic agents (Levodopa being the “gold standard” and the “most effective antiparkinsonian drug”), anticholinergics, amantadine and selegiline.
The research committee of the PNA composed of Artemio Roxas Jr., MD, Mayvelyn Gose, MD, Jaqueline Dominguez, MD, Servando Liban, MD, Raymond Rosales, MD and Madeleine Grace Sosa, MD (15,16) determined the prevalences for stroke, parkinsonism, dementia, migraine and epilepsy by creating and validating a questionnaire for this specific purpose. In their two-part paper, the researchers created and validated a 10-item PNA questionnaire where, for Parkinsonism, two concise and easy to deliver questions were produced (See Table 1).
Table 1. PNA Questionnaire with its Sensitivities and Specificities focusing on Parkinsonism (with permission, Philippine Journal of Neurology, 2007)
Illness |
Questions (any history of&) |
Sensitivity |
Specificity |
Parkinsonism |
Several months of having HAND TREMORS while at rest |
0.586 (0.469-0.694) |
0.891 (.870-0.910) |
|
Several months of SLOWNESS inmovement or moving like a “ROBOT” |
0.725 (0.610-0.816) |
0.853 (0.829-0.874) |
|
Question 5 OR 6 |
0.771 (0.660-0.854) |
0.801 (0.774-0.825) |
In order to obtain national prevalence data on common neurological conditions, Artemio Roxas Jr., MD, Mayvelyn Gose, MD, Jaqueline Dominguez, MD, Servando Liban, MD, Raymond Rosales, MD and Madeleine Grace Sosa, MD (15,16) conducted a cross-sectional study using a multistaged cluster sampling methodology by integrating the validated PNA questionnaire in the National Nutrition Health Survey (NNHeS). The survey was conducted on 4,753 adults aged 20 or more from 2636 households, 17 regions and 79 provinces of the Philippines. The basis for the prevalence of Parkinsonism was based on the participants’ “Yes” response to both questions 5 (indicating tremors) and 6 (indicating slowness or bradykinesia, even possibly rigidity) in the validated PNA survey. A prevalence of 0.95% was acquired, with increasing prevalence with increasing age and a notable female predominance with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.07. There was a higher prevalence for hand tremors alone at 4.88% compared to the prevalence of slowness alone at 2.25%. Self-reporting for PD was also recorded in 0.03% of the participants. It was also discovered that there was a higher positive response to both questions in Regions 6 and 7.
Table 2. National Prevalence of Parkinsonism based on the 2003 National Nutrition and Health Survey (with permission, Philippine Journal of Neurology, 2007)
Neurologic Illness |
Basis for Prevalence |
Prevalence |
Male: Female Ratio |
Peak Prevalence |
Parkinsonism |
Yes response to both Ques 5 (Tremors) and Ques 6 (Slowness) |
0.95% |
1:1.07 |
60 and above |
The researchers considered the prevalence obtained as high compared to neighboring Asian countries given methodological differences such as the focus on Parkinsonism and not PD itself as done in other countries. The prevalence rates of other Asian countries are as follows: India, 0.148%, (40) China, 0.057% (41), and 0.018% (42), Taiwan, 0.127% (43) and 0.13% (44), Singapore, 0.3% (14) and Japan, 0.1% (45). Moreover, other factors such as “drug side effects, toxic exposures, genetic diseases, vascular diseases, metabolic diseases and infections, among others” may have contributed to the obtained prevalence of Parkinsonism given that such factors may cause the aforementioned disease.
IV. X-Linked Dystonia Parkinsonism
Sex linked dystonia parkinsonism (XDP), also referred to as ‘lubag’ in American literature, is an adult onset, sex linked, predominantly male, severe, progressive often debilitating movement disorder. (17-19,46,47). This disorder has a high penetrance and a high frequency of generalization (46). XDP was first described in 1969 in Filipino males from the island of Panay. (18,19)
In the 2003 National Nutrition and Health Survey, a significant increase in positive response to questions 5 and 6 (See Table 1) were noted in regions 6 and 7.These items in the questionnaire indicated the presence of tremors and slowness. (15,16)
The February 2010 data on XPD showed a total of 505 registered XDP cases in the country. The current prevalence rate of XDP in the entire country is 0.31 per 100,000. For Panay Island, a significantly larger rate is noted at 5.74 per 100,000. Within the island of Panay, the highest prevalence was observed in Capiz at 23.66 per 100,000. The total 505 cases are from 253 families with a male-to-female ratio of 100:1 with 500 males and 5 females affected. Cases of XDP have been reported from other countries. Most cases though are among Filipinos with maternal ancestry traceable to Panay islands. (19)
Depending on the exhibited signs by the patient, the pathophysiology of XDP could be divided into two: dystonic and parkinsonian phases. The dystonic phase usually starts at the 3rd or 4th decade of life which spreads to generalization within two to five years. Beyond the 10th year of illness, either the two phases coexists or the dystonia is replaced by parkinsonism. (46)
Understanding the pathophysiology of XDP and development of rational therapies will depend on observations from imaging, pathological, and genetic studies. The cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in XDP shows hyperintense putaminal rim during both dystonic and parkinsonian phases. The caudate head or putamen atrophies in the parkinsonian phase. (17,47) Neuropathological findings confirm an atrophy of the caudate nucleus and putamen, with mild to severe loss of neurons and gliosis (17,48). The neostriatum shows involvement of striosomes, but with matrix sparing during the dystonic phase. During the parkinsonian phase, there is also an involvement of the matrix. In the dystonic phase, the loss of striosomal inhibitory projections lead to disinhibition of nigral dopaminergic neurons, likely resulting to a hyperkinetic state. In the parkinsonian phase, severe and critical reduction of matrix-based projection may result in extranigral parkinsonism. (17,47,49) Genetic sequencing of the XDP critical region in Xq13.1 has revealed an SVA retrotransposon insertion in an intron of TAF1. This may reduce neuron-specific expression of the TAF1 isoform in the caudate nucleus, and subsequently interfere with the transcription of many neuronal genes, including DRD2 (17,47-50)
MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
I. RESEARCH DESIGN
The research design will be a descriptive study of the prevalence and predisposing risk factors of PD in a rural community. The target population for the study consists of all eligible residents of the chosen community, aged 20 years or older in updated 2010 census lists from community registry offices.
The study will use a two-phase design to assess the prevalence of PD. In phase 1, participants will be screened in person using a symptom questionnaire. Those who screened positive will be extensively evaluated by a certified neurologist in phase 2.
To identify the predisposing factors of PD present in the community, the study will use a questionnaire which will include and enumerate various risk factors that contribute to the development of PD, in which the responses will be encoded and interpreted.
II. DATA COLLECTION
A. SELECTION OF STUDY POPULATION
In order to identify where the study will be conducted, the researchers used systematic random sampling in order to select one rural community in a barangay setting.
The researchers used a third party, computer-generated randomizer in order to consecutively randomize similar types of lists, and thereafter, choosing the first item on the produced lists. Of the first list, which comprised of seven of the eight regions in Luzon (given the prevalence of XDP in Visayas and Mindanao; see Part IV. Review of Literature), excluding NCR due to urbanization, Region IV-A or CALABARZON was the first item on the randomly produced list. Consequently, of the second list, which comprised of the five provinces of Region IV-A (Cavite, Laguna, Batangas, Rizal, Quezon), Quezon was the first item on the randomized list. Using the same method on the four districts of Quezon, District 2 was the district to be focused on. Of the five municipalities of the second district of Quezon (Candelaria, Dolores, San Antonio, Sariaya, Tiaong), excluding Lucena City due to its high urbanization, the same method resulted in the selection of Candelaria. Finally, of the twenty rural barangays of Candelaria (Buenavista East, Buenavista West, Bukal Norte, Bukal Sur, Kinatihan I, Kinatihan II, Malabanban Sur, Mangilag Norte, Mangilag Sur, Masalukot I, Masalukot II, Masalukot III, Masalukot IV, Masin Norte, Mayabobo, San Andres, San Isidro, Santa Catalina Norte, Santa Catalina Sur and Masalukot V) Barangay Mangilag Sur was chosen.
B. OCULAR INSPECTION
The first site visit of the researchers to the locale will provide them with necessary information regarding the area and the community before proceeding to the research proper. During this period, the researchers will gather various information regarding the population and its demographic from the city/municipality/town hall. Preliminary data on health status will also be gathered based on community health records in the city/municipality/town health administration offices as well as the barangay health centers, depending on its availability. The initial site visit will also be the time for the researchers to finish all the necessary paper works and to comply with all the requirements set by the city/municipality/town administration before proceeding.
C. SAMPLE SIZE COMPUTATION
Sample size for the study is computed using the 2010 census of Barangay Mangilag Sur. Based on the demographics provided to the researchers by the barangay officials, Barangay Mangilag Sur consists of 1406 households in total, with 6706 individuals meeting the inclusion criteria for the study. The researchers will use the OpenEpi website (openepi.com) to compute for an acceptable number of households which can render the study as valid. The obtained number of individuals will be randomly selected throughout the entire barangay and will be part of the study. For the study, an obtained number of 364 individuals (C.I. = 95%) is the minimum number of individuals needed to make the study valid.
D. SURVEY AND CASE ASCERTAINMENT
After the completion and submission of all the necessary prerequisites and documents, the researchers will proceed to the research proper, which is a two-phase design to assess the prevalence of PD, and the presence of risk factors of PD in the community. The resident population in this study will consist of individuals who are aged 20 years and above from every household within the selected community or locale. Individuals are eligible for the study if they are permanent residents and/or residents of homes or nursing homes located in the community. Individuals will be excluded if they had died or if they no longer resided in the community. Meanwhile, a dedicated movement disorder training on how to clinically examine a patient will be undergone by the researchers, under the guidance of a trained specialist.
In phase 1, the researchers will visit homes in the barangay randomly to administer the questionnaire which contains the screening items in a face-to-face interview. The administered questionnaire includes the respondent’s age, sex, occupation, family medical and social history, economy, food and water source, pesticides, coffee consumption and tea consumption (light or heavy), cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, ancestry, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disorder, trauma, etc. These data will provide the researchers information regarding the respondents who are exposed to risk factors. Such will be recorded and encoded to observe which risk factors potentially contribute to the cases of PD in the barangay.
The questionnaire includes the screening instrument for PD, which consists of two questions that had been validated by the Philippine Neurological Association (see Appendix). In addition, a third question on whether participants have been previously diagnosed with PD was included. In the event that the participant is unable to answer the questions as a result of speech or cognitive disturbances, the caregiver is permitted to answer on the participant’s behalf (14). The screening tool will examine those who are already exhibiting or are starting to demonstrate certain symptoms related to PD. Participants who responded positively to any of the 3 questions will be considered to have screened positive and eligible for phase 2 evaluations. The potential cases will also undergo videotaping following an informed and written consent. A protocol for videotaping will be followed to the letter that may take a total of 3 minutes. The video will then be reviewed by the Parkinsonologist for screening.
Phase 2 of the study, or the case ascertainment phase, will be conducted once there is a “trigger” from the specified questions for PD. The researchers will return to the locale accompanied by an expert in the field of neurology, particularly in PD. The final case ascertainment will then occur for the specialist to specifically do a consultation with the potential case. This would establish the point prevalence of the condition in the given locale.
III. STATISTICAL TREATMENT
Given that the study focuses on finding out the number of individuals from urban and rural communities who may have PD within their population, it is suitable to use prevalence ratio to analyze the data that will be gathered. Specifically, point prevalence rate was defined as the ratio of the number of subjects with evidence of the disease on the screening day to the number of residents surveyed (51). The prevalence rates will be estimated as the number of cases in the community for subjects aged 20 years and over. To compare our results with previous studies, the age-standardized prevalence rates (will be standardized using the 2010 census), sex-specific prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated.
IV. PILOT STUDY/PRETESTING
After conducting an initial ocular visit, the researchers will conduct a pilot study to determine if the questionnaire prepared will be simple for the residents to understand and answer, and more importantly, if it will be able to help the researchers fulfill the objectives of this study. The number of participating individuals for the pilot study will be arbitrarily selected by the researchers and will also be randomly selected from the sample size.
V. CURRENT LEVEL OF RESEARCH
As of today, the research proper, which was started at April 2016, is currently being performed. All necessary documentations and prerequisites prior to the research proper have been filed and duly accomplished by the researchers. The researchers are presently collecting the data from the respondents in Barangay Mangilag Sur, Candelaria, Quezon Province, while simultaneously encoding previously collected data during the previous visits to the community. Statistical analysis will be done after the second phase of the research proper.
1. Samii A., Nutt JG. and Ransom B.R. (2004) Parkinson disease. Lancet. 363(9423):1783-93
2. Davie, C.A. (2008). A review of Parkinson disease. Br. Med. Bull. 86 (1): 109–27. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldn013
3. Obeso, J.A., Rodríguez-Oroz, M.C., Benitez-Temino, B. et al. (2008). Functional organization of the basal ganglia: therapeutic implications for Parkinson disease. Mov. Disord. 23 (Suppl 3): S548–59. doi:10.1002/mds.22062
4. Gelb, D.J., Oliver, E., & Gilman S. (1999).Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 56(1):33-39. doi:10.1001/archneur.56.1.33
5. Jankovic, J. (2008). Parkinson disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 79(4): 368–76.doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.131045
6. Rabo, C., Rosales, R.L. (2009). The occurrence of fatigue in independent and clinically stable Filipino patients with idiopathic Parkinson Disease, Journal of Movement Disorders 2:18-21; KOREA
7. Go, C.L., Rosales, R.L., Tanglao, M.J., & Fernandez, H.H. (2011). Depressive symptoms among cognitively-intact, community-dwelling Filipino patients with Parkinson disease. International Journal of Neuroscience; 121(3):137-4. USA
8. de Lau L.M., Breteler M.M. and Breteler (June 2006). Epidemiology of Parkinson disease. Lancet Neurol. 5(6): 525–35.doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9
9. Sheperjans, F., Aho, V., Pereira, P.A.B., Koskinen, K., Paulin, L., Pekkonen, E., Haapaniemi, E., Kaakkola, S., Eerola-Rautio, J., Pohja, M., Kinnunen, E., Murros, K., Auvinen, P. (2014); Gut microbiota are associated with Parkinson disease and clinical phenotype – A case-control study, Movement Disorders; 29 Suppl 1:1548
10. Vizcarra, J.A., Wilson-Perez, H.E., Espay, A.J. (2014); The power in numbers: Gut microbiota in Parkinson disease (pages 296–298), Movement Disorders; 30 (3): 296-298
11. Braak, H., & Del Tredici K. (2008). Invited article: nervous system pathology in sporadic Parkinson disease. Neurology. 70: 1916–1925
12. Lesage, S., Brice, A., & Brice (2009).Parkinson disease: from monogenic forms to genetic susceptibility factors. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18(R1): R48–59. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddp012
13. Hatano Y, Li Y, Sato K, Asakawa S, Yamamura Y, Tomiyama H, Yoshino H, Asahina M, Kobayashi S, Hassin-Baer S, Lu C, Ng A, Rosales RL, Shimizu N, Toda T, Mizuno Y, Hattori N.; Novel PINK1 Mutations in Early-onset Parkinsonism. Annals of Neurology, 56:424-427, 2004, USA
14. Tan, L.C.S., Venketasubramanian, N., Hung, C.Y., et al. (2004) Prevalence of Parkinson disease in Singapore: Chinese vs Malays vs Indians. Neurology. 62: 1999-2004.
15. Roxas, A., Gose, M., Dominguez, J., Liban, S., Rosales, R.L. & Sosa, M. (2007). The prevalence of stroke, Parkinsonism, dementia, migraine and epilepsy in the Philippines, part I: the validation of the PNA questionnaire. Philippine Journal of Neurology (PhilJNeurol) 11(1): 1-4
16. Roxas, A., Gose, M., Dominguez, J., Liban, S., Rosales, R.L. & Sosa, M. (2007). The prevalence of stroke, Parkinsonism, dementia, migraine and epilepsy in the Philippines, part II: application of the PNA questionnaire in the 2003 National Nutrition Health Survey. Philippine Journal of Neurology (PhilJNeurol) 11(1): 5-11
17. Rosales, R.L. (2010). X-Linked Dystonia Parkinsonism: Clinical Phenotype, genetics and therapeutics. Journal of Movement Disorders 3:32-38 pISSN 2005-940X / eISSN 2093-4939, KOREA
18. Fernandez, H.H., & Rosales, R.L. (2011). Uncovering the Mystery From the Philippine Island of Panay. International Journal of Neuroscience, 121, 1–2, USA
19. Lee, L.V., Rivera, C., Teleg, R., Dantes, M,. Pasço, P.M., Jamora, R.D., Arancillo, J., et al. (2011). The Unique Phenomenology of Sex-Linked Dystonia Parkinsonism (XDP, DYT3, Lubag). International Journal of Neuroscience 121, 3–11, USA
20. Rosales, R.L. (2011). Global Clinical studies in Asia: Philippine side. Clinical Evaluation, 38(4): 676-89. ISSN 0300-305, JAPAN
21. Tanner C.M., &Goldman S.M. (1996) Epidemiology of Parkinson disease.Neurol. Clin. 14: 317–335
22. Alves, G., Forsaa, E.B., Pedersen, K.F., Gjerstad, M.D., & Larsen, J.P. (2008) Epidemiology of Parkinson disease. J Neurol. 2008; 255(Suppl 5): 18-32
23. Elbaz, A., &Tranchant, C. (2007) Epidemiologic studies of environmental exposures in Parkinson disease. J Neurol Sci. 262(1-2): 37-44
24. Wider C. and Wszolek Z. K. (2008) Etiology and pathophysiology of frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson disease and Alzheimer disease: lessons from genetic studies. Neurodegener. Dis. 5: 122–125
25. Fearnley J. M., & Lees A. J. (1991). Ageing and Parkinson disease: substantianigra regional selectivity. Brain. 114(Pt 5): 2283–2301
26. Baba, M., Nakajo, S., Tu, P.H., Tomita, T., Nakaya, K., Lee, V. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., &Iwatsubom T. (1998) Aggregation of alphasynuclein in Lewy bodies of sporadic Parkinson disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Am. J. Pathol. 152, 879–884
27. Schulz-Schaeffer, W. J. (2010). The synaptic pathology of α-synuclein aggregation in dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson’s disease and Parkinson’s disease dementia. Acta Neuropathologica, 120(2), 131–143. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-010-0711-0
28. Olanow C. W. and McNaught K. S. P. (2006) Ubiquitin–proteasome system and Parkinson disease. Movement Disorders. 21(11): 1806-1823
29. Philippine Neurological Association. (2007). Diagnosis and initiation of treatment
of Parkinsondisease. PPD’s Compendium of Philippine Medicine (10th 2008 ed.). Retrieved from http://www.thefilipinodoctor.com/cpm_pdf/CPM10th%20PARKINSON.pdf
30. Caballol, N., Martí, Maria, J., Tolosa, E. (2007). Cognitive dysfunction and dementia in Parkinson disease. Movement Disorders 22(Suppl 17): S358–S366. doi:10.1002/mds.21677
31. Dickson D.V. (2007). Neuropathology of movement disorders.In Tolosa E, Jankovic JJ. Parkinson disease and movement disorders. Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 271–83. ISBN 0-7817-7881-6.
32. Svensson, E., Beiske, A. G., Loge, J. H., Beiske, K. K., and Sivertsen, B. (2012). Sleep problems in Parkinson disease: a community-based study in Norway. BMC Neurology. 12:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-71
33. Winder-Rhodes, S. E., Evans, J. R., Ban, M., Mason, S. L., Williams-Gray, C. H., Foltynie, T., Duran, R., Mencacci, N. E., Sawcer, S. J., and Barker, R. A. (2013). Glucocerebrosidase mutations influence the natural history of Parkinson disease in a community-based incident cohort. Brain. 136, 392-399.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws318
34. Caramelli, P. (2011). Dementia associated with Parkinson disease: usefulness of the Movement Disorder Sociaety diagnostic criteria in Brazil. Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatr., 69:5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2011000600001
35. Tandberg E., Larsen J.P., Karlsen K. (1998) A community-based study of sleep disorders in patients with Parkinson disease. MovDisord. 13(6): 895-9
36. Torpy, J.M. (2004) Dementia. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 292(12)
37. Aarsland, D., Andersen, K., Larsen, J.P., Lolk, A., Nielsen, H. and Kragh-Sørensen, P. (2001). Risk of dementia in Parkinson disease: a community-based prospective study. Neurology. 56(6): 730-6
38. Torpy, J.M. (2010) Depression. The Journal of the American Medical Association.303(19)
39. Tandberg E., Larsen J.P., Aarsland D., Cummings J.L. (1996) The occurrence of depression in Parkinson disease: a community-based study. Arch Neurol. 53(2): 175-9
40. Bharucha, N.E., Bharucha, E.P., Bharuch, A.E., et al. (1988). Prevalence of Parkinson disease in the Parsi community of Bombay, India. Arch Neurol. 45: 1321-1323
41. Li, S.C., Schoenberg, B.S., Wang, C.C., et al. (1985). A prevalence survey of Parkinson disease and other movement disorders in the People’s Republic of China. Arch Neurol. 42: 655-657
42. Wang, Y.S., Shi Y.M., Wu Z.Y., et al. (1991) Parkinson disease in China. Coordinational Group of Neuroepidemiology. PLA. Chin Med J. 104: 960-964
43. Wang, S.J., Fuh, J.L., Teng, E.L., et al. (1996) A door-to-door survey of Parkinson disease in a Chinese population in Kinmen. Arch Neurol, 53: 66-71
44. Chen, R.C., Chang, S.F., Su, C.L., et al. (2001). Prevalence, incidence and mortality of Parkinson disease: a door-to-door survey in Ilan county, Taiwan. Neurology. 57: 1679-1686.
45. Moriwaka, F., Tashiro, K., Itoh, K., et al. (1996).Prevalence of Parkinson disease in Hokkaido, the northernmost island of Japan. Internal Medicine. 53: 276-279
46. Lee L.V., Munoz E.L., Tan K.T. and Reyes M.T. (2001) Sex linked recessive dystonia parkinsonism of Panay, Philippines (XDP). MolPathol. 54(6): 362–368
47. Pasco P.M., Ison C.V., Magpusao N.S., Muňoz E.L., Reyes M.T. (2011) Understanding XDP through imaging, pathology, and genetics. Int J Neurosci. 121(Suppl 1): 12-7 doi: 10.3109/00207454.2010.526729
48. Evidente, V.G., Dickson, D., Singleton, A., Natividad F., Hardy J., Hernandez D. (2002). Novel neuropathological findings in lubag or x-linked dystonia-parkinsonism. MovDisord. 17( Suppl 1): 294
49. Goto S., Lee L.V., Munoz E.L., Tooyama I., Tamiya G., Makino S., et al. (2005) Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia in X-linked recessive dystonia-parkinsonism. Ann Neurol. 58: 7–17
50. Kaji R., Goto S., Tamiya G., Ando S., Makino S. and Lee L.V. (2005) Molecular dissection and anatomical basis of dystonia: X-linked recessive dystonia-parkinsonism (DYT3). J Med Invest. 52: 280-3
51. Chen, C., Chen, T., Hwang, Y., Wen, Y., Chiu, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2009). Different Prevalence Rates of Parkinson Disease in Urban and Rural Areas: A Population-Based Study in Taiwan. Neuroepidemiology, 350-357. Retrieved March 4, 2015, from http://www.proquest.com/
TABLES
Appendix A: Time schedule and Duties of Research Personnel (GANTT Chart)
Apr 2015 | May 2015 | Jun 2015 | July 2015 | Aug 2015 | Sep 2015 | Oct 2015 | Nov 2015 | Dec 2015 | Jan 2016 | Feb 2016 | Mar 2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Research topic selection | ||||||||||||
Research proposal formulation and finalization | ||||||||||||
Research proposal presentation,defense and panel approval | ||||||||||||
Further reading for study ; Ocular inspection of locale | ||||||||||||
Presentation of propasal for IRB approval | ||||||||||||
Training on Movement Disorders by specialist | ||||||||||||
Field survay trainging by epidemiologist | ||||||||||||
Surveying and case ascertainment | ||||||||||||
Clinical Epidemiologu 3 consultation | ||||||||||||
Manuscript revision | ||||||||||||
Data analysis and formulation of written output | ||||||||||||
Thesis defense |
Apr 2016 | May 2016 | Jun 2016 | Jul 2016 | Aug 2016 | Sep 2016 | Oct 2016 | Nov 2016 | Dec 2016 | Jan 2017 | Feb 2017 | Mar 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Research topic selection | ||||||||||||
Research proposal formulation and finalization | ||||||||||||
Research proposal presentation,defense and panel approval | ||||||||||||
Further reading for study ; Ocular inspection of locale | ||||||||||||
Presentation of propasal for IRB approval | ||||||||||||
Training on Movement Disorders by specialist | ||||||||||||
Field survay trainging by epidemiologist | ||||||||||||
Surveying and case ascertainment | ||||||||||||
Clinical Epidemiologu 3 consultation | ||||||||||||
Manuscript revision | ||||||||||||
Data analysis and formulation of written output | ||||||||||||
Thesis defense |
Apr 2017 | May 2017 | Jun 2017 | Jul 2017 | Aug 2017 | Sep 2017 | Oct 2017 | Nov 2017 | Dec 2017 | Jan 2018 | Feb 2018 | Mar 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Research topic selection | ||||||||||||
Research proposal formulation and finalization | ||||||||||||
Research proposal presentation,defense and panel approval | ||||||||||||
Further reading for study ; Ocular inspection of locale | ||||||||||||
Presentation of propasal for IRB approval | ||||||||||||
Training on Movement Disorders by specialist | ||||||||||||
Field survay trainging by epidemiologist | ||||||||||||
Surveying and case ascertainment | ||||||||||||
Clinical Epidemiologu 3 consultation | ||||||||||||
Manuscript revision | ||||||||||||
Data analysis and formulation of written output | ||||||||||||
Thesis defense |
Appendix B: Map of Barangay Mangilag Sur, Candelaria, Quezon
Table 3. Appendix C: Computation of Sample Size via OpenEpi
Sample Size for Frequency in a Population |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population size(for finite population correction factor or fpc)(N): Hypothesized% frequency of outcome factor in the population(p): Confidence limits as % of 100(absolute+/-%)(d): Design effect(for cluster surveys-DEFF): |
6706 50%+/-5 5% 1 |
||||||||||||||||
Sample Size(n) for Various Confidence Levels |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Equation |
|||||||||||||||||
Sample size n = [DEFF*Np(1-p)]/[(d2/Z21-α/2*(N-1)+p*(1-p)] | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Results from OpenEpi, Version 3,open source calculator--SSPropor Print from the browser with ctrl-P or select text to copy and paste to other programs |
CC BY: Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/